Tuesday

Youth Culture and the Church

The perfect storm is a very fitting term for what is going on in our culture. The obsessive service of the individual has led to the abandonment of many groups – youth, elderly, etc. The postmodern mindset no longer allows for others to speak into our lives. Technicism (technology as our savior) has become the means and the end purpose of life. Consumerism is the way to fulfill this purpose. And who we are is defined by our relationship to these things – our profile picture and friend count on MySpace, our rebellion to our parents, our consumption of goods and the group we most closely “relate” to. This context has led to the complete depravation of identity in our culture.

At the basic components of being a human is the need (more than simple desire) to be loved and a part of a community. Seperatist technology – everyone having out own cell phones, computers and social networking profiles in our private rooms – has eliminated the family from our identity. The need for community and love still remains. Thus youth must find their fulfillment in their peers. However, their peers have requirements that must be met as prerequisites to “relationship”. They must be popular, look a certain way, act in a specific fashion, be a part of the correct groups, hold culture’s sexual values, own a plethora of products and so on. This is the setup our culture has placed against the youth: these criteria can never be met. The youth have been predestined by culture for failure. This leads tot eh youth going against their humanity in search of an identity. They seek intimacy, they obtain sex. They seek love, they obtain superficial popularity. The seek beauty, they obtain promiscuity. All along this trail of insufficiencies youth must learn to cope with the inevitable outcome of not being enough. Thus they learn to accept means of escape – cutting, depression, compromised values, loss of humanity.

This is the hope of the church: these criteria never should be met. The church is not to live by the rules and norms culture is regulating. Rather it lives among the weeds in order to produce wheat. The narrator of the gospel provides youth with what they are looking for – purpose, value, mission, acceptance, forgiveness, love and hope. As a community, Christians must call these false idols what they are! We must challenge youth to think critically about the culture rather than mindlessly consuming it (which we must guard ourselves against also). To those too young or incapable of such a task we must be in such a developed, trusting relationship that we have earned the right to speak life and truth into their lives.

We must first believe this gospel that we preach. We are incapable of challenging the culture to new heights if we do not believe them ourselves. Secondly, we must live out these holistic laws. By prayer and fighting temptation we discover our own identity and sureness of our message. Lastly, we must create a new culture in the midst of our present cultures. We do not have to follow or play by the rules culture has set up. Instead, we develop new just, true laws by which to live. Our culture will gain legitimacy as we live out and see the fruit of our faithfulness. We do so by living prophetically regardless of the consequences, success or view others have of us. We live so for the favor of God and by the strength of His Spirit. We live so for the fullness and restoration of the broken and those oppressed by our culture.

Wednesday

doG fo modgniK

I have spent a lot of time wondering what the Kingdom of God looks like. Most of this has been from my (or our) perspective as a Christian. Many times we wonder how we are presenting ourselves to the outside world, or more importantly how we are presenting Christ?

In the midst of all this chaos, questioning what we are supposed to look like I find that our viewpoint is wrong. We wonder what we look like to others, from our own perspective. But what does our culture think of us? Also, should we strive to be so seeker sensitive in the first place?

When I look at John the Baptist, Jesus, Paul, Stephen, Peter, John, etc. I see people who lost themselves in loving others. These were Godly men (one of them a manly God?) who were focused on evangelizing to the lost and discipling the found, picking up the broken and leading them to wholeness and victory in Jesus Christ.

Yet these men were not seeker sensitive. They were prophetic. They spoke the truth in love in all situations. The unmasked the powers that were behind social problems, religious tyranny, and governmental corruption. Simply put, these men did not mess around. They had wonderful relationship with everyone they came into contact with, yet they also preached to those who hated them.

To what extent are our Sunday services to be seeker sensitive? Should we be more concerned about making sure we are not offending outsiders to the point we do not edify the insiders? Need our speaking in heavenly tongues cease so that we do not step on toes? Are we seeking to witness to man rather than glorify God (though they should flow out of each other, is that what is happening?)

I do not know if the world will even accept our message as we would like it to. There is a sense that our message is so natural to the human heart that none would reject it, yet look what they did to the Cornerstone of our faith! 

Here is my understanding. The world cannot understand Christ until our orthopraxis (right action) reflects our orthodoxy (right doctrine). From the world’s perspective, the Kingdom of God is foolishness. The problem is simple: it is illogical to follow God. Why should we place total trust in the hands of something we cannot see? Why are the wealthy made low and the poor exalted? Why must I die to myself in order to live? Why does less of myself mean more of what I was intended to be? In the world’s eyes, the Kingdom of God is backwards. It does not make sense to follow someone who died 2000 years ago and fall in love with the broken and poor of this world when we may become like them.

I am convinced that the world will not accept Christ until we start living out this alternative reality that Christ preached.

Questions

It seems that fitting Christianity into modernistic, defined categories is not plausible. This Christmas break has made me question a lot of things. Many questions arise when we wonder what the Kingdom of God looks like. Tommie Zito wonders if we reaching out enough, taking the Great Commission seriously? Francis Chan wonders if churches are supposed to spend millions on bigger, more comfortable buildings when people are starving? My friend Andrew asks how defined can we make Christianity? My own heart wonders isn’t there more to Christianity than systematizing God?

What does Christianity look like outside of the church on Sunday mornings? Is there more to it than just being a good example at work or for our families? What does the gospel look like when we use our actions AND our words? I do not know, but I’m set on finding out.